BANQUET POLITICS
December 5th, 2008I was at a banquet in Shanghai a couple of weeks ago when I had one of the most surprising conversations about the United States that I’ve heard in 25 years of foreign travel.
The banquet was being hosted by one of my suppliers. At the table were five other Chinese people, two of whom were older men who’d likely never been out of China. Others were younger, but also didn’t speak English.
The fifth was a friend of mine, a fairly highly-ranked Chinese official, a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party who was methodically climbing the ladder to what he hoped one day would be the Premiership of China. Power-wise, he was the Chinese equivalent of a US Representative, except that Chinese politicians don’t run for office and depend instead on appointment by officials that the general public has never even heard of. As strange as this seems to us, it’s entirely in line with millennia of Chinese tradition, where Confucius and his followers made a virtual cult of the civil servant.
The talk turned to the recent presidential election and the older Chinese man asked me who I had voted for. Both myself and another American merchant there said “Obama.” We had voted for him, we had given money to his campaign. They asked how much money, and I told them: it was roughly two months’ salary for the average Chinese factory worker. The older men gave an unmistakable gasp of surprise. For them, voting in an election was exotic, and the idea that an average citizen would give a substantial sum of money to a political candidate must have struck them as totally outlandish.
Finally my politician friend in the Central Committee stood up and said, in Chinese: “That Obama could be elected proves that Americans believe all men are equal. That’s what makes America the greatest country in the world!”
Maybe there was a little Chinese flattery there, but it was still a stunning comment, and I was moved. In all my years of travel I have defended (and sometimes condemned) the United States to a wide array of people. However, I don’t think I’ve ever mounted a more eloquent statement of what is great about the United States than the one I heard that night.


December 8th, 2008 at 8:59 pm
I don’t think that it’s as much as people see Obama as a multiracial man who is highly intelligent and articulate as much as the American people as sick to death of George W. Bush and everything that he stands for. The democratic party could have nominated anyone this side of Charles Manson and won the election.
December 11th, 2008 at 3:44 pm
I agree with rocketman. The voters are desperate for improvement. They see the destruction of our society resulting from lies to the people, unlimited spending for wasteful projects that are not improving our society, and they realize they are seeing the self-destruction of our civilization.
But I do not believe they realize BO is no different than GWB. They are both pawns of the CFR and the Wall Street cult led by David Rockafeller and his foundations of interlocking directorships of all major corporations. The citizens have not yet accepted the fact that DC is being used to further the goals of the wealthy at the cost of the enslavement of the masses. And the hue and cry for government to punish/reform/control Detroit is but another expansion of the power of the wealthy via government subsidy of business overburdened by government costs by income taxes, SS taxes, unemployment taxes, excess labor costs (imposed by government sanctions that are driving jobs off-shore), punitive fines by government agencies, etc.
December 11th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
That Obama could be elected proves a majority of Americans have no idea how economics works.
December 13th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
I do think Obama is a massive improvement over Bush (or I wouldn’t have thrown a bunch of money at him) but he’s certainly inheriting a Corporate Government structure that’s been crafted over the last 30 years or so, and most radically crafted during the last 8 years. You can’t just wave your hand and dispense with that. Otherwise, you’re Hugo Chavez or Evo Morales.
I think Obama represents the end (maybe temporarily) of the idea that Stupid is good. Reagan started it with Simpleton economics, W enhanced that with his ostentatious idiocy and the idea that Stupidity is Character. With Sarah Palin that idea goes even further, that Stupidity combined with complete ignorance of the outside world is a magic ticket to good judgement. The less you know, the more you know.
I think the Republican talking-points managers projected their fantastic world view onto the entire electorate in the last campaign with the idea that somehow Obama’s support was a personality cult, when in fact people recognized that he was intelligent and thoughtful and decided to try that approach to running the country for a change. Republicans calling him the Messiah, etc, was a last-ditch effort to insist that simple reason and intelligence weren’t a basis on which to make a decision, when in fact, I think the majority who voted for Obama were voting for those qualities.
This has been widely recognized all over the world, not just in China. Hopefully it will be widely recognized here, before we elect the next GWB.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:18 am
Thank you for sharing. I came to this site to read how things really are